Lesson: Determining whether a function is Linear or Exponential
(using an example that is neither linear nor exponential)
(using an example that is neither linear nor exponential)
Keeping with my normal theme on this blog, I am going to
explain a mathematical concept using comic books. In particular, I will be
using comic book sales figures for Marvel’s The Avengers from issues #1 to
#500 dating from 1965 to 2005. I have calculated the average sales figures of
the comic series by decade and have listed the results in the below table.
|
Decade
|
1965
|
1975
|
1985
|
1995
|
|
Average Total Paid Circulation (Averaged by decade)
|
204,303
|
206,010
|
201,481
|
106,167
|
Additionally, I have graphed the results:
With this information, I can figure out whether or not this
equation is linear, exponential or neither.
I can predict that since these are sales figures, the relationship is unlikely to be linear or exponential. Likes and dislikes of consumers change at varying rates and. therefore, it is hard to predict sales figures from one year to a next with a consistent rate or change or ratio. This is especially true when dealing with elastic goods such as comic books.
To verify my prediction I will take the following steps:
I can predict that since these are sales figures, the relationship is unlikely to be linear or exponential. Likes and dislikes of consumers change at varying rates and. therefore, it is hard to predict sales figures from one year to a next with a consistent rate or change or ratio. This is especially true when dealing with elastic goods such as comic books.
To verify my prediction I will take the following steps:
Step 1: Can this function be linear?
To figure out if a function is linear, the function must
have a constant rate of change.
The equation for rate of change is y2-y1/x2-x1. In this case:
Average Paid circulation=y
Decade=x
The equation for rate of change is y2-y1/x2-x1. In this case:
Average Paid circulation=y
Decade=x
So:
206,010 (Y2)-204,303 (Y1)/1975 (x2)-1965(x1)
(206,010-204,303)=1707/(10)=170.7
(206,010-204,303)=1707/(10)=170.7
Do this again for decades 3 verses 2 and 4 verses 3:
(201,481-206,010)=-4529
(1985-1975)=10
(1985-1975)=10
-4529/10=-452.9
106,167-201,481= -95314
1995-1985=10
-95314/10= -9531.4
All Rates of Change=
170.7
-452.9
-9,531.4
-452.9
-9,531.4
Since these ROC are NOT all consistent, THIS FUNCTION IS NOT
LINEAR.
Step 2: Can this function be exponential?
The formula for finding exponential functions is Y2/Y1.
This
is called the Ratio.
Below I have found each ratio for decades 2 v. 1, 3 v. 2,
and 4 v. 3.
206,010/204,303=1.008
201,481/206,010=.978
106,167/201,481=.526
Since none of these ratios are consistent, THIS FUNCTION IS
NOT EXPONENTIAL
Conclusion:
As predicted, this function is neither linear nor is it
exponential. This means that it cannot be measured by a constant value that
shows repeated sums (linear) or repeated products (exponents).
Source for figures used in this example: http://www.comichron.com/titlespotlights/avengers.html

This lesson was very good! It taught me what I needed to know and didn't beat around the bush. The examples were also very good and helpful.
ReplyDeletekatie,
ReplyDeletenice job! and i'm glad you stuck with comic book theme. this is a good example that also shows how it's hard to find linear and exponential growth patterns in this type of real life scenario.
professor little